Timeline
The timelines for many of the big infrastructure projects envisioned by the plan are far too long. The political landscape, realities of the climate emergency and priorities of the general public will change significantly over the decade or so between when projects initially go out for consultation and when they are implemented. Timeframes need to be condensed to reflect the urgency of climate action. Delays to announced timelines also need to be avoided.
Big projects need expanded design teams in order to ensure that the timelines are accelerated as much as possible. We have previously seen significant delays on the design phase of projects. We cannot afford these to be repeated in these projects if the 2030 targets for emission reductions are to be reached.
Accelerated timelines are also necessary for the success of demand management strategies. There will be a limit to how many journeys can be displaced from private cars if there are not sufficient alternatives available to absorb these journeys.
In particular the Finglas Luas could and should be brought on stream quicker. With an expanded design team and tendering taking place in parallel with the design and planning phase the project should be deliverable in advance of 2030.
The current system of evaluating projects according to a business case is ill-equipped to reflect the climate crisis and adding to the timeline for delivery. An alternative system of proofing, prioritising and accelerating projects according to their ability to deliver on urgent emissions mitigation measures is needed.